|
Norman v. State (FL) is the case of a law abiding concealed carry licensee who was arrested and prosecuted in Fort Pierce, FL for violating Florida nearly complete ban on Open Carry after his otherwise lawfully carried handgun unknowingly became unconcealed while walking.
A St. Lucie County Judge denied all constitutional arguments to dismiss the case against Dale Norman. While the court made findings that the statute is overbroad and is facially vague, the court still issues a conviction on a “as applied” standard.
The County Court judge also did not fully consider the Second Amendment or FL Art.1 Sec. 8 question; denying that motion to dismiss the case because the question of the right to bear arms "is for someone above the level of this court."
The Second Amendment question is fairly straightforward; Florida courts have clearly acknowledged that the carrying of a concealed firearm is a privilege, subject even to being banned completely, not a right protected by the constitution. Florida appellate courts have held that the “Retroactive application of (new Florida Statutes), is not unconstitutional because a license to carry a concealed weapon or firearm is a privilege and not a vested right.” Crane v. Department of State, 547 So. 2d 266 (Fla. 1989).
The Florida Legislature and Supreme Court have long recognized that there is a right to bear arms outside of the home. The “privilege of a license to carry a concealed weapon or firearm” recognized in Crane cannot replace, or substitute for, the fundamental right guaranteed by the U.S. and Florida Constitutions.
The County Court has certified the constitutional questions directly to the 4th District Court of Appeals as questions of great public importance. The DCA has accepted jurisdiction.
The Florida Attorney General's Office filed an extraordinary motion with the Florida Supreme Court attempting to prohibit the 4th District Court of Appeals from hearing the case. Mr. Norman's Attorney filed a motion to strike or deny the Attorney General's baseless motion. On April 19th, 2013 the Florida Supreme Court denied the AG's attempt to derail the appeal to the 4th DCA.
Florida Carry is providing for the continued defense of Dale Norman and seeks to clarify what the right to bear arms is in Florida. Please help us win this fight for your RIGHT to Bear Arms by joining Florida Carry or donating to our cause.
Docket Overview: Lower Court Case Number: 2012-MM-000530-A
St. Lucie County Clerk of the County Court
Lower Court Filings:
06/08/2012 Motion to Dismiss - OC Ban Unconstitutionally Vague
06/08/2012 Motion to Dismiss - OC Ban Violates Second Amendment and Art. 1 Sec. 8 FL Constitution
06/08/2012 Motion to Dismiss - OB Ban Unconstitutionally Proscribes Action without Mens Rea
08/22/2012 Lower Court's Written Order - Certified constitutional questions directly to the Florida 4th District Court of Appeals as matters of great public importance.
08/29/2012 Notice of Appeal
Docket Overview: Appellate Court Case Number: 4D12-3525 Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal Docket
Appellate Court Filings on Jurisdiction:
|
Date Docketed
|
Description
|
Date Due
|
Filed By
|
Notes
|
| 09/27/2012 |
Notice of Appeal Filed |
|
Ashley Minton , Appellant |
|
| 09/27/2012 |
Determination of Indigent Status |
|
|
|
| 10/05/2012 |
Order for brief memorandum on 9.160 case |
10/15/2012 |
|
**VACATED 12/04/12** |
| 10/15/2012 |
Notice of Appearance |
|
Eric J. Friday 797901, Appellant |
|
| 10/15/2012 |
Memorandum Brief |
|
Eric J. Friday 797901, Appellant |
(2) T- |
| 10/22/2012 |
Motion To Compel |
|
Attorney General-W.P.B. AG01, Appellee |
(M) PRODUCTION OF AN APPENDIX *AND* T - |
| 10/22/2012 |
Motion for Extension of Time to File Response |
|
Attorney General-W.P.B. AG01, Appellee |
(M) TO MEMORANDUM BRIEF |
| 11/07/2012 |
Motion To Dismiss |
|
Attorney General-W.P.B. AG01, Appellee |
T - |
| 12/04/2012 |
ORD-Vacated |
|
|
10/05/2012 ORDER |
| 12/04/2012 |
Order to Show Cause-Appeal Dismissal |
12/14/2012 |
|
10 DAYS |
| 12/17/2012 |
RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE |
|
Eric J. Friday 797901, Appellant |
|
| 01/08/2013 |
ORD-Denying Aplee's Motion to Dismiss |
|
|
|
| 01/08/2013 |
ORD-Moot |
|
|
(APPELLEE'S 10/22/12 MOTION TO COMPEL, ETC.) |
| 01/10/2013 |
Motion for Clarification |
|
Attorney General-W.P.B. AG01, Appellee |
OF 12/4/12 AND 1/8/13 ORDERS |
| 01/24/2013 |
Miscellaneous Entry |
|
|
COPY OF PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION AND APPENDIX FILED IN SUPREME COURT. AE Attorney General-W.P.B. AG01 |
| 01/29/2013 |
ORD-Granting Clarification |
|
|
THIS COURT HAS ACCEPTED JURISDICTION IN THIS CASE, AND APPELLEE HAS NO FURTHER OBLIGATION TO ADDRESS THE JURISDICTIONAL ISSUE. |
| 01/31/2013 |
Court Reporter Acknowledgment Letter |
|
|
|
| 02/19/2013 |
Ack. Receipt from Supreme Court |
|
|
SC13-212 |
| 04/22/2013 |
Supreme Court Disposition |
|
|
SC13-212 DENIED |
|
Docket Overview: Florida Supreme Court Case Number: SC13-212 Florida Supreme Court Docket
Supreme Court Filings on Jursidiction:
|
Date Docketed
|
Description
|
Date Due
|
Filed By
|
Notes
|
| 01/30/2013 |
State's Petition for Writ of Prohibition |
|
State Of Florida STATE BY: PT Cynthia Laine Comras 151319 Attorney General-W.P.B. |
|
| 02/07/2013 |
Motion to Strike or Dismiss Petition for Writ of Prohibition |
|
Dale Lee Norman BY: RS Eric J. Friday 797901 |
|
| 04/19/2013 |
Final Disposition - Writ Denied |
|
|
The petition for writ of prohibition is hereby denied because petitioner has failed to demonstrate that a lower court is attempting to act in excess of its jurisdiction. See Mandico v. Taos Constr., Inc., 605 So. 2d 850 (Fla. 1992); English v. McCrary, 348 So. 2d 293 (Fla. 1977). Any motions or other requests for relief are hereby denied. |
|
Docket Overview: Appellate Court Case Number: 4D12-3525 Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal Docket
Appellate Court Filings on Merits:
|
Date Docketed
|
Description
|
Date Due
|
Filed By
|
Notes
|
| 03/06/2013 |
Received Records |
|
|
FOUR (4) VOLUMES (WITH CD-ROM) |
| 04/09/2013 |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief |
|
Eric J. Friday 0797901, Appellant |
|
| 04/11/2013 |
Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief |
04/22/2013 |
|
ORDERED that appellant's motion filed April 9, 2013, for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief on or before April 22, 2913. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions. |
| 04/22/2013 |
Supreme Court Disposition |
|
|
SC13-212 DENIED |
| 04/22/2013 |
Initial Brief on Merits |
|
Eric J. Friday 0797901, Appellant |
|
| 05/17/2013 |
Notice of Agreed Extension - Answer Brief |
|
Attorney General-W.P.B., Appellee |
30 DAYS TO 06/21/13 |
| TBD |
Appellee's Answer Brief |
6/21/2013 |
Attorney General-W.P.B., Appellee |
|
|
|