Home | Litigation | Florida Courts | Norman v. State
Norman v. State Print E-mail

Norman v. State (FL) is the case of a law abiding concealed carry licensee who was arrested and prosecuted in Fort Pierce, FL for violating Florida nearly complete ban on Open Carry after his otherwise lawfully carried handgun unknowingly became unconcealed while walking.

A St. Lucie County Judge denied all constitutional arguments to dismiss the case against Dale Norman. While the court made findings that the statute is overbroad and is facially vague, the court still issues a conviction on a “as applied” standard.

The County Court judge also did not fully consider the Second Amendment or FL Art.1 Sec. 8 question; denying that motion to dismiss the case because the question of the right to bear arms "is for someone above the level of this court."

The Second Amendment question is fairly straightforward; Florida courts have clearly acknowledged that the carrying of a concealed firearm is a privilege, subject even to being banned completely, not a right protected by the constitution. Florida appellate courts have held that the “Retroactive application of (new Florida Statutes), is not unconstitutional because a license to carry a concealed weapon or firearm is a privilege and not a vested right.” Crane v. Department of State, 547 So. 2d 266 (Fla. 1989).

The Florida Legislature and Supreme Court have long recognized that there is a right to bear arms outside of the home. The “privilege of a license to carry a concealed weapon or firearm” recognized in Crane cannot replace, or substitute for, the fundamental right guaranteed by the U.S. and Florida Constitutions.

The County Court has certified the constitutional questions directly to the 4th District Court of Appeals as questions of great public importance.  The DCA has accepted jurisdiction.

The Florida Attorney General's Office filed an extraordinary motion with the Florida Supreme Court attempting to prohibit the 4th District Court of Appeals from hearing the case. Mr. Norman's Attorney filed a motion to strike or deny the Attorney General's baseless motion. On April 19th, 2013 the Florida Supreme Court denied the AG's attempt to derail the appeal to the 4th DCA.

Florida Carry is providing for the continued defense of Dale Norman and seeks to clarify what the right to bear arms is in Florida. Please help us win this fight for your RIGHT to Bear Arms by joining Florida Carry or donating to our cause.


Docket Overview: Lower Court Case Number: 2012-MM-000530-A

St. Lucie County Clerk of the County Court


Lower Court Filings:

06/08/2012 Motion to Dismiss - OC Ban Unconstitutionally Vague

06/08/2012 Motion to Dismiss - OC Ban Violates Second Amendment and Art. 1 Sec. 8 FL Constitution

06/08/2012 Motion to Dismiss - OB Ban Unconstitutionally Proscribes Action without Mens Rea

08/22/2012 Lower Court's Written Order - Certified constitutional questions directly to the Florida 4th District Court of Appeals as matters of great public importance.

08/29/2012 Notice of Appeal


Docket Overview: Appellate Court Case Number:  4D12-3525
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal Docket


Appellate Court Filings on Jurisdiction:

Date Docketed
Description
Date Due
Filed By
Notes
09/27/2012 Notice of Appeal Filed   Ashley Minton , Appellant  
09/27/2012 Determination of Indigent Status      
10/05/2012 Order for brief memorandum on 9.160 case 10/15/2012   **VACATED 12/04/12**
10/15/2012 Notice of Appearance   Eric J. Friday 797901, Appellant  
10/15/2012 Memorandum Brief   Eric J. Friday 797901, Appellant (2) T-
10/22/2012 Motion To Compel   Attorney General-W.P.B. AG01, Appellee (M) PRODUCTION OF AN APPENDIX *AND* T -
10/22/2012 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response   Attorney General-W.P.B. AG01, Appellee (M) TO MEMORANDUM BRIEF
11/07/2012 Motion To Dismiss   Attorney General-W.P.B. AG01, Appellee T -
12/04/2012 ORD-Vacated     10/05/2012 ORDER
12/04/2012 Order to Show Cause-Appeal Dismissal 12/14/2012   10 DAYS
12/17/2012 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE   Eric J. Friday 797901, Appellant  
01/08/2013 ORD-Denying Aplee's Motion to Dismiss      
01/08/2013 ORD-Moot     (APPELLEE'S 10/22/12 MOTION TO COMPEL, ETC.)
01/10/2013 Motion for Clarification   Attorney General-W.P.B. AG01, Appellee OF 12/4/12 AND 1/8/13 ORDERS
01/24/2013 Miscellaneous Entry     COPY OF PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION AND APPENDIX FILED IN SUPREME COURT. AE Attorney General-W.P.B. AG01
01/29/2013 ORD-Granting Clarification     THIS COURT HAS ACCEPTED JURISDICTION IN THIS CASE, AND APPELLEE HAS NO FURTHER OBLIGATION TO ADDRESS THE JURISDICTIONAL ISSUE.
01/31/2013 Court Reporter Acknowledgment Letter      
02/19/2013 Ack. Receipt from Supreme Court     SC13-212
04/22/2013 Supreme Court Disposition     SC13-212 DENIED

Docket Overview: Florida Supreme Court Case Number:  SC13-212
Florida Supreme Court Docket


Supreme Court Filings on Jursidiction:

Date Docketed
Description
Date Due
Filed By
Notes
01/30/2013 State's Petition for Writ of Prohibition   State Of Florida STATE BY: PT Cynthia Laine Comras 151319 Attorney General-W.P.B.  
02/07/2013 Motion to Strike or Dismiss Petition for Writ of Prohibition   Dale Lee Norman BY: RS Eric J. Friday 797901  
04/19/2013 Final Disposition - Writ Denied     The petition for writ of prohibition is hereby denied because petitioner has failed to demonstrate that a lower court is attempting to act in excess of its jurisdiction. See Mandico v. Taos Constr., Inc., 605 So. 2d 850 (Fla. 1992); English v. McCrary, 348 So. 2d 293 (Fla. 1977). Any motions or other requests for relief are hereby denied.

Docket Overview: Appellate Court Case Number:  4D12-3525
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal Docket


Appellate Court Filings on Merits:

Date Docketed
Description
Date Due
Filed By
Notes
03/06/2013 Received Records     FOUR (4) VOLUMES (WITH CD-ROM)
04/09/2013 Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief   Eric J. Friday 0797901, Appellant  
04/11/2013 Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief 04/22/2013   ORDERED that appellant's motion filed April 9, 2013, for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief on or before April 22, 2913. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions.
04/22/2013 Supreme Court Disposition     SC13-212 DENIED
04/22/2013 Initial Brief on Merits   Eric J. Friday 0797901, Appellant  
05/17/2013 Notice of Agreed Extension - Answer Brief   Attorney General-W.P.B., Appellee 30 DAYS TO 06/21/13
TBD Appellee's Answer Brief 6/21/2013 Attorney General-W.P.B., Appellee  

Last Updated on Monday, 20 May 2013 12:52
 
Banner